News Alert: Man Smokes Cigars, Claims Fire Damage

Smoking fine cigars can get expensive, but I don’t recommend scheming for monetary compensation.  This cigar-smoking lawyer thought he had worked out the perfect crime, but ultimately paid a price far beyond the cost of his cigars.  Here’s the story:

Place: Charlotte, North Carolina.

“A lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against, among other things, fire.  Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company.  In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost in a series of small fires. The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. The lawyer sued – and WON! (Stay with me.)  Delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company, in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable ‘fire’ and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars that perished in the ‘fires’. NOW FOR THE BESTPART. After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.

Caveat: This urban legend was taken from the Internet and is presented only for its entertainment value.  Its source is unknown and authenticity questionable.

One Response to “News Alert: Man Smokes Cigars, Claims Fire Damage”

  1. TseNagi

    I didn’t read any where in the artical that he admitted to starting any fire any where or time the inshurance Co. said “the obvious” and I don’t think the arson charge would stick @ My court, They do not have any witnesses either,So my decision is for the defendant !!! 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.